Thursday, October 1, 2009

COM101 Blog Entry #4 - Miss Singapore World Interview




Miss Singapore World 2009 Interview


First things first, yes I know this is so "last season", but all we do when we watch this video is laugh uncontrollably at BOOMS and... you know...? Yah! Ok, jokes aside. My analysis on this interview would definitely not include any personal judgements about her being chosen as Miss Singapore or what she says, but more on the way she communicates. Besides, that's what all the fuss is about, right?


My analysis will focus on Non-verbal Communication and so I wouldn't be analysing so much of what she says, but more of how it is being communicated.


1) Physical Appearance


She is rather well-kempt and presents herself well. Her hair is neatly pulled back with natural make-up to enhance her features. From this we can interpret her as someone who is able to carry herself well, maybe a model, or someone in a profession that requires her to present herself well (maybe the media).


2) Oculesics (Eye Behaviour)


At the start of the interview, she looks directly at the camera, thus projecting confidence. Subsequently, she alternates between looking at the camera and at the interviewer.She tries to keep eye contact with either the interviewer or with the camera (audience), and this can be interpreted as her having a very friendly personality. Occasionally she will look either upwards or away, especially just after being given a question. This may indicate nervousness.


3) Paralinguistics (Vocal Behaviour)


Vocal quality : Her tone and pitch is more on the higher side and it tends to fluctuate often. There are certain words that tend to be higher in volume and thus it is emphasized (such as "red" and "loud"). This emphasis is known as accenting. The sudden increase in pitch and volume shows her excitement and enthusiasm about the topic.


Vocalizations : There are occasional giggles that, I would say, are supressed, and thus might indicate nervousness.


Vocal segregates : There are a few occasions where there are pauses, for instance at the start, when she pauses in between "Currently I'm majoring in my" and "Diploma in Health Science..." This short pause is accompanied by a retraction in eye contact and thus indicates some form of uncertainty or anxiety. In addition, she uses fillers such as "you know" and "yah." The use of fillers allow any speaker more time to think and formulate his or her thoughts. In this case, she is being interviewed and the fillers allow her to have a tad more thinking time whilst sorting out her thoughts. Fillers are very useful when it comes to speaking to an audience or during an interview. However, usage of the same fillers constantly might hamper the overall quality of the speech as it may be interpreted as uncertainty.

4) Kinesic (Body Movement and Gestures)

Throughout the whole interview, the interviewee has used two gestures that come alongside what she is saying. The first would be when she says "BOOMS" which is being accompanied by hand gestures that illustrate an explosion. The second would be when she says "strut down Orchard Road" and makes a hand gesture that illustrates a walk forward. In both cases, the use of hand gestures act as illustrators, which are gestures that accompany speech and add to the meaning of utterances. In addition, illustrators describe an object/event and indicate its size, shape or movement. These illustrators repeat what the communicator is saying.

The above analysis on the interviewee's use of Non-verbal Communication may have deeper implications however that will be up to the interpretation of my readers who are so kind so as to leave comments. =)

7 comments:

  1. hey kartini...
    this is some intresting work. i actually never looked at the miss world pageant in that sense..you have actually changed my perspective and now I can actually relate it to my communication class.

    ReplyDelete
  2. SGFAIL, no doubt one of the epic failures in Singapore!

    Apart from the words she's chosen to use in this particular interview, I think that her non-verbal cues reflect her LOUDLY as well!

    I think the way she spoke was *the thing* that she's heavily criticized on. All the stuttering and mispronunciation, people just didn't expect that to come out from a winning candidate of Miss World Singapore. After passing critical judgment at this point of time, their perception was further confirmed by the other non-verbal cues that you've mentioned and explained!

    Thus, it really shows that the non-verbal cues actually had more impact on the viewers in making their judgments :D

    ReplyDelete
  3. Heya! Kelly here. This is an intersting post. I also used Ms Ris Low as an illustration of my blog entry about her non-verbal cues.

    I like the part where you mentioned about her using fillers when she added in unneccesary words like "er" and "lah". Bad as they sound, i think such words can be a sign of the culture or background of the speaker. They can also be used as an adaptor as a sign of uncertainity or uneasiness the speaker is facing.

    It is also intersting to note your definition of accenting- the increase in pitch and volume of the word.

    Overall, good post! and i am looking forward to seeing your comments in my blog! I sincerely hope u'll be able to comment 3-4 comments on my blog by tomorrow night. Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  4. kartini kamaluddin. you've analysed her so in depth you're acting like her now. that's what happens :) i think ris low has been a huge influence. Booms is gonna stay in an average Singaporean's vocab for a looooong time.

    ReplyDelete
  5. BOOMZ! I LOVE RIS LOW!! She is so hot! We should not criticize her so bad cos that's the way she is and if she can't adapt to English or talking fluently then we shouldnt blame her. But i can see that you have analyzed her actions in a very unbiased way. and i do agree with most of ur critiques......nevertheless i hope ris tries to improve her speech cos it'll be useful fr her in the future!! hehe

    whhheeeee

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hello kat.

    I cant believe you made me comment on your blog. But still i tink ur entries are quite interesting. I find this one particularly apt for analysis because RIS provides us with lots of tings to analyse..esp wher communication is concerned. i can see tt u hav chosen to critic her mostly in nonverbalcommunicatn, and these r definitely the reasons why us audience perceive her as incompetent.

    see u around....

    ReplyDelete
  7. HI KARTONO

    you know what. you find d weirdest tings to analyze. i tink pple r quite bad cos they criticize ris for the shortcomings. but othr thn tt, after reading ur analysis, ive come to realise some of the tings tt actually enhance wat she says, and nt jus wat is bein said. kinda funny hw she has such actions, nw tt i tink abt it, i can even laughh wifout hearing what she has to say becos her actions are quite funny.

    still i tink we shudnt mke so much fun of her. she is human, afterall.

    ReplyDelete